In Ivory Tower Writing #10, I discussed some general guidelines on how to compose paragraphs, structure paragraphs, and some tips on how to create “flow” in your essay. In this post, I’ll discuss the classic five-paragraph essay and how it helps students grasp the basics of composition and coherence. I’ll also cover some problems of the five-paragraph essay and how it should ideally be used in instruction.Continue reading “Ivory Tower Writing #20: Composition – the five paragraph essay”
Though a film review wouldn’t necessarily qualify as a piece of academic writing (a book review would, which I’ll address in a future post), it’s indeed a nifty and also low-stress (experience may vary) exercise which helps sharpen that eye for detail, analytical argument, and reflexive skills (as in, “reflection” not motoric reflexes).
And not to mention there’s an entire field of study in IR devoted to understanding the influence of pop culture and IR. In that sub-field, reflective analysis of films (also known as “visual artifacts”) make up a substantial part of the literature (see, for example, Heck’s analysis of narratives in docudramas [paywall]).
So, how do you write a reflective film review? This post provides some general guidelines. As such, it shouldn’t be treated as an authoritative template; instead, think of it as a simple checklist of things you may want to make sure are included in your review.Continue reading “Ivory Tower Writing #19: Writing a film review for class”
This post further explains the types of papers you may encounter during your university life and what to expect from them.
I’d like to continue on from where we left off at post #8 when I first discussed the types of papers that you may meet throughout your university life. This time, let’s focus on some of the more specific types of papers.
This post discusses what a “contribution” means and why it’s often best to not overthink it.
In post #6 when I wrote about how to write a literature review, I mentioned that it should highlight a “contribution” that your research will make. Now, let’s talk about what this means and why you don’t always have to overthink this.
This post covers some practices on how to write a conclusion that’s conclusive.
At this point, we’re almost done with the paper. You’ve fleshed out your ideas in paragraph after paragraph and you don’t have anything more to say. But wait, there’s still one part left: the conclusion.
Cue the groans.
“But I’ve already made my point! Why do I have to write more?”
Well, as I’ve said before, academic writing is a circular process. Like it or not, you have to write a conclusion. So, let’s get down to business.
This post provides pointers on how to organize your ideas in the body of your paper.
Now that we’ve covered the introduction, it’s time for us to tackle the brunt of the writing work in the body of the paper. Let’s assume your introduction has been interesting enough so the readers want to read more. This is where you will have to organize your ideas in a meaningful manner and develop your argument to the fullest.
As usual, I won’t speak about how you ought to write; writing in an academic style is fairly straightforward and you are allowed to insert your personal style a bit. However, I will provide some pointers as to how you could organize your ideas so they make sense. We’ll cover paragraph structure and bit by bit, we’ll get to body structure.
Let’s get started.
This post provides pointers on how to write an enticing introduction section for academic papers.
They say that first impressions are everything, and you don’t get a second chance at making first impressions. Such holds true for even academic papers. Your introduction is your first chance to hook readers into reading the rest of your paper, so you better work hard on it.
At this point, we have covered the general parts of the introduction, so let’s get to the actual writing. Also, because writing an inviting introduction is hard, this section is often written first and finished last.
This post discusses some pointers in distinguishing the different types of papers that you may encounter during your academic life.
At this point, you have some of the basics of structure covered. Before discussing more basics, I think now’s a good time to understand the types of papers you may encounter when you’re in university.
Some general advice first. You ought to always pay attention to the wording of your research question (as I’ve mentioned in post #4), as this determines the general character of your paper. This also applies to questions your professor gives you. If they provide you with a research question, then you actually have your work cut out for you. You may also have to do some work, especially if all they give you is a statement like “Robotics will change the nature of war. Discuss.”
This post covers some pointers on data and sources which forms the bulk of any paper, particularly printed and textual sources.
While you’re doing your literature review (or revising an existing one), you should be familiar with sources and data at this point. This post serves as a guide regarding these two things. We’ll cover things like what “good” sources and data are and how not to get bamboozled into using less credible sources. As usual, the material here is targeted primarily for my undergraduate students. Let’s get to it.